What is training efficiency?

Training efficiency is how much time and money it takes to get people to the standard you need. It is the cost side of training, measured next to whether the training worked.

In shortTraining efficiency measures the resources used to train employees, such as paid training hours, trainer time and materials, against the result, usually how quickly people reach full productivity. It is different from training effectiveness, which asks whether people learned and changed how they work. A program can be effective and wasteful, or cheap and useless; you need both views. For hourly employees, training time is usually paid work time, which makes the hours the biggest cost.

Efficiency vs. effectiveness

Effectiveness asks: did the training change what people do? Efficiency asks: what did it cost to get there, and could we get the same result with less? The two are measured with different numbers. For effectiveness, see how to measure training effectiveness. For efficiency, the common measures are:

Weeks to proficiency0123456Before: 6 weeksAfter: 4 weeks
Shorter classroom time plus a buddy on live work moved the proficiency curve two weeks to the left.

Why training hours are usually paid

Under the federal rule at 29 CFR 785.27, time spent in lectures, meetings and training programs does not have to be counted as working time only if all four conditions are met: it is outside the employee’s regular working hours, it is truly voluntary, it is not directly related to the employee’s job, and the employee does no productive work during it.

Required job training for a new hire fails at least two of those tests, so the hours are paid. That is why trainee hours belong in the efficiency calculation, and why they should be recorded on the timesheet as training time rather than left off. See compensable time.

Worked example: a customer support team cuts time to proficiency

20 new hires, before and after a buddy system

A support center trains 20 new agents a quarter. Each spends 32 paid hours in classroom training at $18 an hour, which is $11,520. Two trainers spend 40 hours each at $26 an hour, which is $2,080. Training cost is $13,600, or $680 per new agent, and new agents take about six weeks to handle calls on their own.

The center cuts classroom time to 24 hours and pairs each new agent with an onboarding buddy for the first two weeks of live calls. Classroom cost falls to $8,640 for trainees plus $1,560 for trainers. Time to proficiency drops to about four weeks. The buddies’ time is not free, so the center tracks it as a separate job code on the timesheet to see the real total, instead of declaring victory on the classroom number alone.

Mistakes that are specific to training efficiency

Cutting training time without cutting quality

  1. Find what new hires actually struggle with by asking them and their trainers.
  2. Move reading and videos into short paid sessions inside the first shifts, not long classroom blocks.
  3. Replace some classroom time with supervised practice on real work.
  4. Check skills with a short sign-off instead of counting hours spent.
  5. Measure time to proficiency for every group, so you know whether a change helped.

Every hour removed from training has to be replaced by something that teaches as well. Cutting time without changing the method usually just moves the learning onto the floor, where mistakes cost more.

Second example: a sign-off instead of a fixed course

A warehouse runs every new picker through a fixed 16-hour training course, whatever their experience. Experienced pickers finish bored, and new ones still need help on the floor.

The warehouse replaces the course with a 4-hour safety session for everyone and a skills sign-off on the floor. Experienced pickers pass the sign-off in their first shift; new ones practice with a buddy until they pass. Average paid training time falls from 16 hours to about 10, and pick accuracy in the first month is the same as before.

Use a job code for trainingHave trainees and trainers clock training time to its own job or role tag. After one quarter you will know the real cost per new hire, including the senior time that never shows up in a training budget.

Questions people ask

What is the difference between training efficiency and training effectiveness?

Efficiency is the cost in time and money to reach a result. Effectiveness is whether the result happened. You need both to judge a program.

How do you calculate training efficiency?

Add up paid trainee hours, trainer hours and materials, divide by the number of trainees, and compare it with time to proficiency. The training cost calculator does the first part.

Do I have to pay employees for training?

Usually yes for hourly employees. Federal rules let you leave training time unpaid only if it is outside normal hours, voluntary, not directly job-related and involves no productive work. Some states have stricter rules.

What is time to proficiency?

The time it takes a new or retrained employee to perform at the expected standard without close supervision. It is often the most useful efficiency number because it captures how well the training worked.

What is a good time to proficiency?

It depends on the job. Track your own number for each role and aim to shorten it without lowering quality.

Should trainer time count in training cost?

Yes. Trainer hours are often a large part of the real cost, along with trainee hours and materials.

Related on EZTime

Keep reading

Keep HR paperwork and updates in one place

Digital HR forms, e-signatures and a digital employee file with expiry reminders, plus announcements by location, department or role.

Disclaimer: Treat this guide to training efficiency as general information rather than legal, payroll or tax advice: rules vary by location and change, and every example here is fictional.